Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Vivisection, or the use of animals in biomedical research, dissection, testing and education, deprives animals of their natural rights and is a great injustice. Using animals in research 774 Words 4 Pages Animal Testing In contemporary times of manufacturing, there are a lot of different newly made products, like cosmetics, food, drinks, clothing, and so on. An estimated 26 million animals are used for testing and research each year. Imagine this, you wake up on a cold floor in what seems to be a jail cell. Due to such organizations, there have been more reasons to find ways to no longer find the need to test on animals.
From a practical perspective, the use of animal experiments guarantees the safety of humans. So why unreasonably harm the animals? Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people. The earliest one can be traced back to 2nd centuries, when Aristotle was the first one to conduct animal testing. This issue would not only bring up how certain things would be considered wrong like hunting animals and keeping them locked in a zoo for entertainment, but would also imply how society has the obligation of preventing suffering brought on from animal testing. I vote for not torturing innocent animals and caging animals that belong in the wild and testing on prisoners with life sentences and those on death row. They maintain that unlike humans that have the ability to reason, animals have no right. Animals are just as entitled to the rights of living, avoiding pain, and pursuing happiness as humans are.
Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. When an opinion regarding whether or not animal testing is ethical is mentioned in conversation or our news, citizens generally begin to question its morality. Questions about issues in the news for students 13 and older. Should be allowed to test medical purposes on animal rather than human being? Responses on animals different from that on humans Animal studies can't actually confirm or refute hypotheses about human physiology or pathology. You would think that the amount of animals being used for testing would have lead to a huge remarkable discovery, but in reality it has only lead us to ineffective experiment, unprofitable funding, and the coast of many lives of innocent animals.
Furthermore, numerous products we use everyday, such as cosmetics and shampoos, are also tested on animals. The usual method of payment is by credit card, online, but you can also use PayPal. The serious ethical dilemmas involved demand that a wider range of perspectives is included in decision making. Beloved house pets such as rodents, rabbits and even dogs are being tested on all over the world. But this action to protect the welfare of captive chimpanzees by classifying them as endangered could unintentionally deliver a serious blow to wild apes. Sadly, these animals are taken into shelters or pounds and if not claimed or adopted they are euthanized or become test subjects.
This was a part of the more extensive Fission Product Inhalation Program which started in 1961. Who cares if mice and rats are affectionate or if they form lifelong relationships? Before such experiments are conducted, the scientists need to consider the animal rights as well as the ethical and moral standards that govern the existence of both human beings and animals. Animal testing is a controversial topic which benefits humans greatly and should be justified but, may not be necessary due to different alternatives. Scientist argues that animal testing has saved many lives and other alternatives might not produce accurate results like animal tests. What if by cutting up a rat and putting toxins on it you saved a million human lives by curing a disease? Although researchers have depended on animal test data to achieve medical advances, there should be other means of research because testing on animals is cruel, inhumane, and often unnecessary. Here you will learn 5 steps to go through to get you starting your preparation for the exam and some key questions…. It is selfish of us to use animals for our own personal reasons.
This successful experiment proved that infections do not start suddenly or without a reason. Experiments therefore can do much to belittle the complex nature of human diseases that are affected widely due to genetic factors, psychological factors, socioeconomic factors and a wide range of other personal experiences. Consequently, it has been realized that animal tests do not offer accurate results or predictions on the extent to which human beings can be affected by a particular drug. Luckily, there could be a solution: oral vaccination. However, I beg to differ because humans and animals are too different to make animal research any useful for humans, animal testing is cruel and unjustified, and animals too have moral rights.
I will also explain the pros and cons on animal testing. Furthermore, the tests are not precise because there have been products found to cause cancer in animals but also cures human ailments. The negative publicity and consumer pressure surrounding these p. Many great feats have been accomplished using animal based testing. According to Mohandas Gandhi, the United States will never be a great nation unless they start treating animals the way that we want to be treated. Animals such as mice and rats have been found to have psychological and genetic similarities that relate to humans which make them perfect for the experimental trials.
They are deprived of food, water, and sleep. If animals do feel a little pain, can you imagine how they feel? Evolutionary science stands against human dominion of animals Humans have evolved from animals and from a common single cell organism. Certain groups against animal testing argue that what may be beneficial for an animal, such as a rat or a pig, may not be beneficial for humans. Animal testing can sometimes be very inhumane and unnecessary, but I do not believe that it should be stopped entirely, rather brought down to a smaller scale, only used for medical research and should only take place if it happens to be the only affective way. Substances such as eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals, despite the fact that the test results don't help prevent or treat human illness or injury. I have had many dogs and cats throughout my life and even a couple hamsters, rabbits, and fish.
Simply in the United States alone, there are very few laws protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the researchers force upon them with many broad exceptions. Apart from the scientists themselves, and the Home Office, there are other influences. In this essay, you are asked to discuss the arguments for and against animal testing, and then give your own conclusions on the issue. Animals possess the same kind and of feelings and emotions that humans do and without anaesthesia, they are subjected to unbearable pain which eventually leads to their ill-fated and gruesome death. Furthermore, the tests are not precise because there have been products found to cause cancer in animals but also cures human ailments. In the United States, in many cases of Scientific Research, animals are used to test out specific products that are yet to become consumer products; usually the testing is for other medical purposes. Some say that these experiments are not painful, so they are justified.
Despite this alarming statistic, scientists still use animals in these experiments. According to The California Biomedical Research Association 2013 , almost every new breakthrough of medical invention is based on animals testing in past 100 years. Would you put the life of an animal before your own? Although testing on animals may have limitations, they are also the closest living thing to humans. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane, using innocent creatures for science experiments. What has however been controversial with animal experiments is whether this procedure should be banned or not based on its ethical implications. The use of animals in research generates two key questions: Are animal experiments necessary and are they morally justified? For example in toxicology testing, in vitro and in silico will not work well.